Answer is NOT SIX?

 


It happens like clockwork. Every few months, a simple math problem slithers its way onto Facebook, X, or TikTok, igniting a firestorm of thousands of angry comments. People question each other's intelligence, swear their college professors taught them differently, and dig their heels into entirely different answers.

The latest digital battleground is centered squarely on the image , which presents a seemingly harmless expression:

The graphic boldly teases, "Answer is NOT SIX?", immediately sending the internet into a tailspin. Why does an elementary school math problem cause so much psychological warfare? Let’s dissect the math trap breaking the internet and find out why so many people get it wrong.

The Trap: How People Arrive at "6"

If you aren't paying close attention, it is incredibly easy to fall into the exact trap the image creators laid for you. Millions of people look at the expression and calculate it from left to right like they are reading a sentence:

  1. They see  and immediately subtract it to get 5.

  2. They look at the parentheses:  equals 4.

  3. They multiply their two results:  20.

Wait... twenty? Where did the "6" come from then?

Ah, the real trap is an even weirder mental glitch. Many people do the parentheses first: . Then, their eyes wander to the numbers on the left. They see the 7 and the 2 and subconsciously think, "Well,  is , and  is close to... wait, what if I do ?"

Alternatively, some people misread the expression entirely, treating it as if the 2 isn't multiplying the parenthesis, or they completely scramble the Order of Operations. Let's set the record straight using actual mathematical laws.

The Reality: The Order of Operations

To solve this correctly, we have to dust off standard algebraic rules. Whether you learned it as PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication/Division, Addition/Subtraction) or BODMAS (Brackets, Orders, Division/Multiplication, Addition/Subtraction), the hierarchy of math remains exactly the same.

Let's break down the expression step-by-step: